• normalexit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My problem is there are so few good movies coming out. I’m completely over the superhero crap. I don’t want to see the next random Star Wars thing. I don’t want a remake of a classic film I loved when I was younger.

    There are some originals coming out, and that makes me happy, but I think the key is having good movies people actually want to see.

    That said I’m interested in seeing Sinners, but I’ll probably wait to stream it, lol.

    • totallyNotARedditor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Also, I’d prefer to rewatch stuff that it’s best enjoyed at the cinema. I don’t want a remake. Just rescreen the original movie, I’d totally pay for it

      • TheImpressiveX@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Some smaller, local theaters allow you to do that, you can rent out the the entire theater and have them play a Blu-ray of the film on their projector.

        The only problem is that it’s absurdly expensive, since you’d be paying for every seat in the theater.

    • TheImpressiveX@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My problem is there are so few good movies coming out.

      Lots of good movies come out all the time, they’re just not as aggressively marketed as superhero movies, mainly because they’re not as profitable as big-budget movies.

      but I think the key is having good movies people actually want to see.

      That’s not necessarily true. Just because a movie is good doesn’t mean it will make money for the studios/theaters.

      From last year, we had “Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga”, “Transformers One”, and “The Fall Guy” - all good movies that bombed at the box office.

      That said I’m interested in seeing Sinners, but I’ll probably wait to stream it, lol.

      …and this attitude is why we will never get good original movies.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I like to calculate enjoyment per hour for cost. Red dead 2 took me 120 hours for $60. That’s 50 cents an hour, and not counting the now many replays. So there’s a good bar.

        Then you have the movies, who now want upwards of 12-14 dollars an hour of enjoyment. Or I just wait until I can get it at home.

        Now, there’s a lot of variable there, something being more expensive does not mean bad, I can justify the costs if I want it enough or if I’m, say, looking forward to a specific movie. But they’re fighting for our leisure time, our Friday and Saturday nights, and for that cost it’s just not worth going to the movies and “seeing what’s showing” anymore. They nickel and dimed us out of that experience. Why go spend $40-50 dollars for 2 to go see a movie when we could rent one at home, or play a game, or any number of things?

  • kowcop@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    18 hours ago

    In Australia, we mostly have the equivalent, which is ‘tight-arse tuesday’

    • keyez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Plenty of other theaters in the US do discount days, AMC is just catching up now but probably too late.

  • Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Too little too late. I used to love going to the movies a few times a year growing up. Now I rarely see a movie worth watching, much less worth paying that much money. The medium has kind of died to me, and I took an elective in school specifically because I enjoyed movies so much.