• Rodneyck@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Actor pretending theaters will be relevant in the future to justify their over-paid salaries. Next up, water is wet.

      • Rodneyck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Doesn’t take 10k these days, TV’s are cheap, 5.1 surround systems are cheap, popcorn even cheaper.

        • doodledup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          If you want an experience similar to how the movie was intended to be watched then you definitely need a couple thousand. Most movies are filmed in 4K, so you need a proper projector and screen size to even see a difference in resolution (I’d say 100 inch minimum). And it needs to have Dolby Vision HDR10+ support. Then you need a Dolby Atmos setup with a compatible receiver too. 5.1 won’t cut it with most movies. It’s definitely worth it if you can afford it. But if you can’t afford it, a theatre is still the only way.

          Or you just watch it on your soundbar and your 50 inch TV. Or on your phone even. But then you’re not the target audience of cinema anyways.

          • Rodneyck@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            But then you’re not the target audience of cinema anyways.

            Says you. Not applicable to me.

            • doodledup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Each to their own. Totally respect that everyone enjoys movies their own way. Theatres need to do that to and adapt to their core audience (like me) and they will stay relevant.