I never really see hardware lacking Linux support mentioned, which got me caught by surprise when a computer with a Broadcom network card couldn’t use the card. What other hardware don’t work with Linux?

  • 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Broadcom, as you’ve discovered. That’s the one brand that I’ve always had trouble with; they go out of their way to be closed source: never publishing specs, never responding to developers. They’re horrible to the point where I will not buy any product that uses Broadcom chips. Which used to be a PITA because they were also common.

    Fingerprint readers, in general, also widely seem to be poorly supported.

    One of my computers has a MediaTek wireless chip where WiFi isn’t supported but Bluetooth does.

    A lot of people have problems with NVidia cards; I’ve not had trouble with either AMD or Intel GPUs (although, I think all Intel GPUs are CPU integrated?).

    Multifunction printers are still iffy, and even just plain printers can give grief; I’ve come to believe that this is simply because CUPS is ancient and due for a completely new, modern printing service. It’s an awful piece of software to have to work with.

    • Magiilaro@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Cups is so much better then everything printer related that is available for Windows and it works so good that even Apple was not able or willing to create something on their own and are using it their OS on all devices. Yes, the web interface is dated but nearly every Desktop comes with a modern integrated interface for printer setup and configuration. It is ages that I had to use the web interface. Cups comes with a boatload of printer drivers out of the box. And if not then there are often PPD files on the homepage of the printer manufacturer.

      Multifunction printers are a special case and if they are supported or not depends either on how the device is build (are the parts addressable Independently as printer, scanner, modem/Fax) or is it all a integrated mashup that needs special software or drivers from the manufacturer. In the first case can the printer part often be used with cups and the scanner with sane. Well in the second case there is not much that Linux developers can do without support and goodwill from the manufacturer.

    • IHave69XiBucks@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I have spent literal hours of my life trying to get the fingerprint reader on a latitude 7400 to work and i just gave up lol. Passwords are underrated anyway.

    • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Brother printers have a good reputation in the linux world. Not sure what the current status is… My printer is over 15 yrs old

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I bought a new one recently. Apparently they’re doing a subscription thing now, so look closely at which model you’re buying. But other than that, it works just the same as my old one.

      • morbidcactus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I bought a Brother colour laser last year (which on the outside looks identical to the monochrome one I bought 17 years ago that lives with my parents), zero issues, which pretty much has been my experience with printers on linux (also tried a ~5 y/o & 25 y/o HP LaserJet, one being the cheapest thing I’ve ever used, other being old office equipment, think I tried the Epson ecotank and photo printer my mil has as well)

      • statler_waldorf@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        We have a wireless Brother laser MFP from 2-3 years ago that just works. I needed to scan something for the first time a few weeks ago and started to go down to rabbit hole of the official driver package but then I decided to give “scanimage” a try and it just found the scanner.

      • HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’ve run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia on linux and I would say my intel experience was by far the best. I use an a380 in my server for transcoding, and I had an a750 in my desktop but switched to a b580. AMD gets the graphics stuff right, but intel does the graphics and compute right on linux where AMD ROCM is a major pain in the ass. It may not be great if you do tons of gaming, but it works quite well for me.

      • mat@linux.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Hmm, I run an Arc GPU at work without any issues. Just using plain mesa on NixOS. The Intel devs were quite responsive when we ran into issues as well.

        • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Arc support was added after release to Linux Kernel 6.2 and it’s steadily improved since. Older Linux distros, or “LTS” oriented distros that favour stability may still not have support for them. I know Unraid was very slow to pick up on it and I had to settle for passing the pcie device through to a VM to get it working. Intel is keen to made these viable though, and I love having the AV1 encoder from my A380.

          • mat@linux.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Ah I see, haven’t been on “stable” distros for a long time so I wasn’t affected. I’ve enjoyed the good support and the video stuff is definitely nice. On the AMD side, still no idea how to encode or decode anything on my Framework 16, meanwhile Intel is acing it.