I don’t think static linking is that difficult. But for sure it’s discouraged, because I can’t easily replace a statically-linked library, in case of vulnerabilities, for example.
You can always bundle the dynamic libs in your package and put the whole thing under /opt, if you don’t play well with others.
What are the crazy historical reasons? As far as I know, running six ttys and one graphical session, in that order, has been standard.
The really crazy historical way to test for crashes is num/scroll/caps lock. That’s handled by a very low-level kernel driver. If those are responsive, it’s probably just your display (gpu, X, wayland, or something) that’s locked up. If they’re unresponsive, your kernel is locked up. (If you’re lucky, it’s just gotten real busy and might catch up in a minute, but I’ve only seen that happen once.)
Anything that might interfere with sleep. Literally any attached device might have a buggy driver.
I don’t see a list of hardware in your edit.
Yes. And these posts should be sent there. I don’t come to the Linux community for shitposting.
It’s for work? Keep using Windows. VM or separate PC or whatever. Maybe WINE.
You could just move the dir and leave a symlink in its place. It doesn’t solve the actual problem, but it’s much easier and will keep everything working just fine.
What default?
I’m guessing one of the services makes that change on startup. Start them one by one and see. Then check its configuration.
Personally I just run them in containers. Much less mess.
You don’t need to connect them to a display. Give them power and network, and access them remotely via ssh (or graphical protocol if you really want to, but unless you specifically want to run interactive GUIs there’s not much point).
As for combining their power… it depends on what kind of work you want to do.
Generally, we don’t. I can count on one hand the number of times I’ve had to mess with it. Two times I had to use restorecon, and two times I had to loosen permissions for an HTTP server. Literally everything else has worked without issue.
I know some people love to bitch and moan about it, but honestly I have to ask what they’re doing, because I’ve had zero non-trivial problems.
GPL would not require that. It would only require publication of the source. There is no requirement to give back or even make your changes compatible with upstream.
I assume this is in reference to the rust coreutils being MIT-licensed. How would using GPL benefit them?
I don’t think anyone is relying on performance of coreutils. If you’re concerned about performance, you’re already writing a program directly, not using a shell script.
I hope someday they are finally able to create a web browser that can run on Linux
export PS1="\[\e]0;\u@\h:\w\a\]\[\e[1;34m\]\u@\h:\w\[\e[0m\]\$ "
I am a simple man.
EUdora, since I don’t think the mail client is still under development
When?
You can.
What laptop? BIOS option?