Pennomi

It is possible to get AI images copyrighted if they contain portions that are edited by a human. For instance, this year InvokeAI copyrighted an image that was completely generative, but used extensive inpainting, by arguing that the human decision process was a necessary part of that work.

I personally disagree with that ruling (but then again I disagree with the concept of copyright altogether).

How will they enforce this? And won’t the actual effect be the improvement of LLMs to the point they can no longer be distinguished from human text? I suspect this will end up being like a slow GAN training the LLMs.

Yep, unlike the US, they aren’t shooting themself in the foot. As they industrialize and invest in Africa, they are displacing the established world order.

What’s there to debate? You put your data in a public site, it gets read by anybody who wants it. Period.

I liked the Exploriens too, but yeah Ice Miners was peak.

Eh, spend that money on indie games and you’re doing good in the world regardless.

As much as Disney is terrible, this lawsuit was always frivolous. Just because two ideas are similar doesn’t mean anything. It’s the details that truly matter.