Hello, Linux people. Anyone tried lingmo os? Is it stable? In videos the interface looks kinda clean and its based on Debian. Sounds nice. Anyone made some tests? Greetings

https://lingmo.org/

  • pyssla@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    OP is still a very new Linux user (if at all) that hammers on stability in every one of their posts. My comment was written with that in mind. But, even in its current version, it isn’t absolute and leaves room for nuance/exceptions by using terms like “(almost)” etc.

    Veteran users with awareness of the Linux landscape are somewhat able to discern the upcoming serious projects with a future from the to-be abandonware. FWIW, I’ve championed distros like Bazzite (and its uBlue siblings), CachyOS, Nobara, PikaOS and secureblue far before they had any serious recognition (if at all). So I’m definitely with you that promising projects deserve adoption, support and more.

    And let’s be honest, if a distro is a one man or small team project, mass adoption is no guarantee of longevity.

    Agreed. I believe the “somewhat” I used alludes to that. One might argue that the concept of absolute guarantee doesn’t exist. Even with Arch and Debian*; though I’d argue they come closest IMO. Nevertheless, there are definitely gradations between Arch/Debian and a student-owned hobby project that was created just today.

    Mass adoption is a relatively easy metric to gauge. And (often) comes with tons of support/discussion across the internet that will prove to be useful for the new user.

    Please feel free to provide other metrics that OP or others might appeal to.

    • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      OP is still a very new Linux user (if at all) that hammers on stability in every one of their posts.

      Ah, I missed that nuance. In such a case, I always recommend one of the big three, Ubuntu, Mint, and Fedora. When they’ve been using that for long enough to know what they don’t like about it, it’s a good time to start exploring the wider ecosystem.

      Even with Arch and Debian

      Yeah, they’ve been around long enough that I’d be surprised if they vanished. I would add openSUSE and Slackware (even though it’s a one man project) to that list. Of course Patrick Volkerding could get fed up with maintaining Slackware at any time.

      And (often) comes with tons of support/discussion across the internet that will prove to be useful for the new user.

      That can be a double-edged sword, especially if the distro has been around a long time. What the user finds can be out of date and now just plain wrong. Ubuntu definitely suffers with this.

      Please feel free to provide other metrics that OP or others might appeal to.

      Besides longevity and adoption, I would argue that whether it has new enough drivers and firmware to support your hardware is the most important metric out there. For example, if your hardware is newer, you should likely choose Fedora from the big three.

      • pyssla@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That can be a double-edged sword, especially if the distro has been around a long time. What the user finds can be out of date and now just plain wrong. Ubuntu definitely suffers with this.

        Excellent point! Thank you for mentioning this! I feel this is often overlooked for reasons I don’t understand. Thankfully, we can teach (new) users how they can navigate around this: e.g. by mentioning the version of the distro within the search query OR by simply being wary of old(er) info.