I realized my VLC was broke some point in the week after updating Arch. I spend time troubleshooting then find a forum post with replies from an Arch moderator saying they knew it would happen and it’s my fault for not wanting to read through pages of changelogs. Another mod post says they won’t announce that on the RSS feed either. I thought I was doing good by following the RSS but I guess that’s not enough.

I’ve been happily using Arch for 5 years but after reading those posts I’ve decided to look for a different distro. Does anyone have recommendations for the closest I can get to Arch but with a different attitude around updating?

  • Philamand@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only issue is that you provide free testing for IBM, so it’s a no go if you try to boycott/avoid US companies. If you don’t it’s indeed a great choice.

      • Philamand@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Telemetry, but I don’t know if many Linux user doesn’t turn it off. But I also don’t know if many Linux user doesn’t fill bug reports.

        Also, if you use Fedora you may recommend it to people that will leave telemetry and/or file bug report. And you also contribute to make the red hat ecosystem relevant, potentially bringing paid customers for RHEL. It’s a drop in the ocean of course, but personally I don’t want to contribute to it.

        • verdigris@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          As long as they’re not for the core Fedora projects why not? Bugs for those should be scarce and there are many other users to report them anyway.

          Using and contributing to FOSS is hardly scabbing regardless. Unless you’re donating to the project I wouldn’t consider even bug reporting as directly supporting IBM. The tangible profit to them is pennies if that.